SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FORESTS ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IMITATION MODELLING

D. N. Tebenkova ^1*, N. V. Lukina ¹, A. D. Kataev ¹, S. I. Chumachenko ², V. V. Kiselyova ², A. A. Kolycheva ¹, V. N. Shanin ^{1, 3, 4}, Yu. N. Gagarin ¹, A. I. Kuznetsova ¹

¹ Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity of the RAS

Profsoyuznaya st. 84/32 bldg. 14, Moscow, 117997, Russia

² Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Mytishchi Branch
1st Institutskaya st. 1, Mytishchi, Moscow Oblast 141005 Russia

³Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil Science of the RAS,
Institutskaya st. 2, Pushchino, Moscow Oblast 142290, Russia

⁴ Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology of the RAS — the Branch of Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the RAS
Institutskaya st. 4, Pushchino, Moscow Oblast, 142290, Russia

 

* E-mail: tebenkova.dn@gmail.com

Received: 22.12.2021

Revised: 22.02.2022

Accepted: 28.02.2022

 

Sustainable forest management implies the necessity to maintain and uphold balance between the growing demand for the forest ecosystem services (ES) and capabilities present. This issue motivates the development of ways to include various ES into the forest ecosystems planning and management system, taking into account social, political, environmental and economic contexts. One of the effective tools for the ES management is imitation modeling, which allows assessing the decision-making risks and consequences. This raises the scientific problem of substantiating possible alternative scenarios for the future forest area development for subsequent simulation.

This article is aimed at analyzing the approaches to creating scenarios for the development of a forest area for the local level imitation modelling and testing a new method based on the development of the existing approaches to solving this problem. In its first part, modern research analysis in the field of imitation scenarios development is presented; the second one proposes a new scenarios’ compiling method, created within the framework of the POLYFORES project, and also presents the results of its testing at three model sites located in the Nizhny Novgorod region, the Republic of Karelia and the Moscow region. For the forest plots of the Nizhny Novgorod region, four scenarios for the forest area development have been created, aimed at obtaining benefits: 1 — from timber harvesting, 2 — from recreational ES and food forest resources, 3 — from regulating ES, 4 — both from timber harvesting, under the conditions of intensified forest growing, and from regulatory ES. For forest plots in the Republic of Karelia, the first scenario describes the situation of meeting the demand for wood, while also preserving the biodiversity and regulating ES, the second and third scenarios take into account the increased demand for wood, with low and high priorities for environmental conservation. For the forest plots of the Moscow region, only two scenarios were relevant, with the increasing need of citizens for recreational ES, and the biodiversity preservation priority in management decisions making either remaining low or increasing. For each scenario, forestry activities corresponding to the objectives of management have been developed. The proposed scenarios can be used to obtain information about the various management decisions impact on the forest ES supply.

Key words: scenario, forest ecosystem services, key factors, forestry regimes, European part of Russia

 

REFERENCE

Account Ability, AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard Exposure Draft: AA1000SES, London, 2005, 40 р., Available at: https://clck.ru/dQnzT (2022, 20 February).

Alcamo J., Henrichs T., Towards guidelines for environmental scenario analysis / Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis, Elsevier Science, 2008, рр. 13–25.

Amer M., Daim T. U., Jetter A. A., Review of scenario planning, Futures, 2013, Vol. 46, pp. 23–40.

Andersen P. D., Hansen M., Selin C., Stakeholder inclusion in scenario planning — A review of European projects, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, Vol. 169, 120802 p.

Andrews J. D., Dunnett S. J., Event-tree analysis using binary decision diagrams, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2000, Vol. 49, No 2, pp. 230–238.

Berkhout F., Hertin J., Jordan A., Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as “learning machines”, Global Environmental Change, 2002, Vol. 12, No 2, pp. 83–95. 

Binder S., Haight R. G., Polasky S., Warziniack T., Mockrin M. H., Deal R. L., Arthaud G., Forest Service General Technical Report NRS-170 Northern Research Station Assessment and Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services: State of the Science Review, Newtown Square, PA, USA: The US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2017, 47 р.

Börjeson L., Höjer M., Dreborg K. H., Ekvall T., Finnveden G., Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide, Futures, 2006, Vol. 38, No 7, pp. 723–739.

Bousquet F. Barreteau O., d’Aquino P., Etienne M., Boissau S., Aubert S., Le Page C., Babin D., Castella J. C., Multi-agent systems and role games: collective learning processes for ecosystem management, Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent systems, 2002, pp. 248–285.

Bowman C., Strategy in practice. London: Prentice Hall Europe, 1998, 201 p.

Cash D. W., Clark W. C., Alcock F., Dickson N. M., Eckley N., Guston D. H., Jäger J., Mitchell R. B., Knowledge systems for sustainable development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003, Vol. 100, No 14, pp. 8086–8091. 

Castella J. C., Trung T. N., Boissau S., Participatory simulation of land-use changes in the northern mountains of Vietnam: the combined use of an agent-based model, a role-playing game, and a geographic information system, Ecology and Society, 2005, Vol. 10, No 1, рр. 1–32.

Chumachenko S. I., Korotkov V. N., Palenova M. M., Politov D. V., Simulation modelling of long-term stand dynamics at different scenarios of forest management for coniferous-broad-leaved forests, Ecological Modelling, 2003, Vol. 170, No 2–3, рр. 345–361.

Chumachenko S., Kiseleva, V., Kolycheva, A., Mitrofanov E., Modeling of multiple forest use under different management scenarios, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2020, Vol. 574, No 1, Р. 012011.

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A New Forest Strategy: For Forests and the Forest-Based Sector, European Commission, 2013, 17 р., Available at: https://clck.ru/dQAuq (2021, 10 October).

Cornish E., Futuring: The exploration of the future, World Future Society, 2004, 313 р.

Costanza R., Trek, Ecotopia, Big Government, The Futurist, 1999, No 33, р. 23.

De Vente J., Reed M. S., Stringer L. C., Valente S., Newig J., How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands, Ecology and Society, 2016, Vol. 21, No 2, 24 p. 

Delphin S., Escobedo F. J., Abd-Elrahman A., Cropper W. P., Urbanization as a land use change driver of forest ecosystem services, Land Use Policy, 2016, Vol. 54, рр. 188–199.

Duffy J. E., Godwin C. M., Cardinale B. J., Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity, Nature, 2017, Vol. 549, No 7671, рр. 261–264.

Duinker P. N., Greig L. A., Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future, Environmental impact assessment review, 2007, Vol. 27, No 3, рр. 206–219.

Enzer S., Cross-impact techniques in technology assessment, Futures, 1972, Vol. 4, pp. 30–51.

EPA’s Treatment of Biogenic Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Emissions from Stationary Sources That Use Forest Biomass for Energy Production. USEPA, 2018, Available at: https://clck.ru/dQJb6 (2021, 15 October).

Estoque R. C., Murayama Y., Quantifying landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes in four rapidly urbanizing hill stations of Southeast Asia, Landscape Ecology, 2016, Vol. 31, No 7, рр. 1481–1507.

The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people, Rome: FAO and UNEP, 2020, Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca8642en/online/ca8642en.html (2021, 18 October).

Ferraro P. J., Hanauer M. M., Miteva D. A., Nelson J. L., Pattanayak S. K., Nolte C., Sims K. R., Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, Vol. 112, No 24, рр. 7420–7425.

Fontela E., Hingel A., Scenarios on economic and social cohesion in Europe, Futures, 1993, Vol. 25, No 2, рр. 139–154.

Forsell N., Turkovska O., Gusti M., Obersteiner M., Den Elzen M., Havlik P., Assessing the INDCs’ land use, land use change, and forest emission projections, Carbon balance and management, 2016, Vol. 11, No 1, рр. 1–17.

Gaßner R., Plädoyer für mehr Science Fiction in der Zukunftsforschung [in:] Streifzüge ins Übermorgen, Weinheim (Eds. Burmeister K., Steinmüller K.), Basel: Beltz Verlag, 1992, pp. 223–232.

Gauvin C., Uchida E., Rozelle S., Xu J., Zhan J., Cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services with dual goals of environment and poverty alleviation, Environmental management, 2010, Vol. 45, No 3, pp. 488–501.

Glenn J. C., Gordon T. J., (eds.): The Millennium Project: Futures Research Methodology, Version 3.0, 2009.

Godet M., How to be rigorous with scenario planning, Foresight, 2000, No 2, No 1, pp. 5–9.

Gordon T. J., Hayward H., Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting, Futures, 1968, Vol. 1, pp. 100–116.

Görg C., Landscape governance: The “politics of scale” and the “natural” conditions of places, Geoforum, 2007, Vol. 38, No 5, pp. 954–966.

Greeuw S. C. H., Van Asselt M. B. A., Grosskurth J., Storms C. A. M. H., Rijkens-Klomp N., Rothman D. S., Rothmans J., Cloudy Crystal Balls: An assessment of recent European and global Scenario studies and Models, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2000, No 17, 113 р.

Harrison S. R., Qureshi M. E., Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models, Natural Resources Forum, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2000, Vol. 24, No 1, pp. 11–19.

He Y., Wang W., Chen Y., Yan H., Assessing spatio-temporal patterns and driving force of ecosystem service value in the main urban area of Guangzhou, Scientific Reports, 2021, Vol. 11, No 1, pp. 1–18.

Heinecke A., Die Anwendung induktiver Verfahren in der Szenario-Technik [in:] Szenariotechnik: Vom Umgang mit der Zukunft (Eds. E. P. Falko, Wilms), Bern: Haupt Verlag, 2006, pp. 183–213.

Hengeveld G. M., Schüll E., Trubins R., Sallnäs O., Forest Landscape Development Scenarios (FoLDS) — A framework for integrating forest models, owners’ behaviour and socio-economic developments, Forest Policy and Economics, 2017, Vol. 85, pp. 245–255.

Henrichs T., Zurek M., Eickhout B., Kok K., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Ribeiro T., Van Vuuren D., Volkery A., Scenario development and analysis for forward-looking ecosystem assessments [in:] Ecosystems and human well-being: a manual for assessment practitioners (eds. N. Ash, H. Blanco, K. Garcia, T. Tomich, B. Vira, M. Zurek, C. Brown), Washington, D. C., USA: Island, 2010, pp. 151–220.

Hetemäki L., Hanewinkel M., Muys B., Ollikainen M., Palahí M., Trasobares A., Aho E., Ruiz C. N., Persson G., Potoćnik J., Leading the way to a European circular bioeconomy strategy, European Forest Institute, 2017, Vol. 5, 52 р.

Ho J. K. K., Formulation of a systemic PEST analysis for strategic analysis, European academic research, 2014, Vol. 2, No 5, pp. 6478–6492.

Hoogstra M. A., Schanz H., Future orientation and planning in forestry: a comparison of forest managers’ planning horizons in Germany and the Netherlands, European Journal of Forest Research, 2009, Vol. 128, No 1, pp. 1–11.

http://kremlin.ru/acts/assignments/orders/53775 (2021, 15 October).

http://rbf-ras.ru/news-2021-09-30/ (2021, 12 October).

https://ru.investinrussia.com/data/files/sectors/ru-ru-wild-growing-herbs-in.pdf (2021, 25 October).

IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P. M. Midgley (eds.), Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 1535 p.

IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, L. A. Meyer (eds.), Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2014, 151 p.

IUCN Red List, 2020. Available at: https://www.iucnredlist.org/assessment/red-list-index (2021, 15 October)

Jarke M., Bui X. T., Carroll J. M., Scenario management: An interdisciplinary approach, Requirements Engineering, 1998, Vol. 3, No 3–4, Р. 155–173.

Jungk R., Müllert N. R., Zukunftswerkstätten: Mit phantasie gegen routine und resignation, Heyne, 1997.

Kahn H., Wiener A. J., The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, Political Science Quarterly, 1968, Vol. 83, No 4, pp. 663–665.

Kangas A., Korhonen K. T., Packalen T., Vauhkonen J., Sources and types of uncertainties in the information on forest-related ecosystem services, Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, No 427, pp. 7–16.

Kärkkäinen L., Haakana H., Hirvelä H., Lempinen R., Packalen T., Assessing the impacts of land-use zoning decisions on the supply of forest ecosystem services, Forests, 2020, Vol. 11, No 9, p. 931.

Kiseleva V. V., Chumachenko S. I., Mitrofanov E. M., Karminov V. N., Kolycheva A. A., Resursnye i jekonomicheskie aspekty neistoshhitel’nogo lesopol’zovanija (Resource and economic aspects of sustainable forest management), Lesa Rossii: politika, promyshlennost’, nauka, obrazovanie, Materialy VI Vserossijskoj nauchno-tehnicheskoj konferencii (Forests of Russia: politics, industry, science, education. VI All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference) Saint-Petersburg: SPbGLTU, 2021, pp. 212–215.

Kok M. T., Kok K., Peterson G. D., Hill R., Agard J., Carpenter S. R., Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios, Sustainability Science, 2017, Vol. 12, No 1, pp. 177–181.

Kolycheva A. A., Chumachenko S. I., Dolgosrochnyj prognoz urozhajnosti lesnyh jagod pri razlichnyh vidah rubok, Materialy IV Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Proceedings of the IV All-Russian scientific conference with international participation) Moscow: CEPF RAS, 2020, pp. 55–57.

Komarov A., Shanin V., Manov A., Kuznetsov M., Osipov A., Bobkova K., Modeling the dynamics of natural forest ecosystems in the northeast of European Russia under climate change and forest fires, Écoscience, 2014, Vol. 21, No 3–4, pp. 253–264.

Kosow H., Gaßner R., Methods of future and scenario analysis: overview, assessment, and selection criteria, DEU, 2008, Vol. 39, 133 p.

Lang T., Scenario planning: your key to the future, Curtin University of Technology, 2001.

Leskinen P., Lindner M., Verkerk P. J., Nabuurs G. J., Van Brusselen J., Kulikova E., Hassegawa M., Lerink B., Russian forests and climate change. What Science Can Tell Us 11. European Forest Institute, 2020, 140 p. DOI: 10.36333/wsctu11.

Liang J., Crowther T. W., Picard N., Wiser S., Zhou M., Alberti G., Schulze E. D., McGuire A. D., Bozzato F., Pretzsch H., De-Miguel S., Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests, Science, 2016, Vol. 354, No 6309. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8957.

Litvinenko A. V., Bogdanova M. S., Karpechko V. A., Litvinova I. A., Filatov N. N., Vodnye resursy Karelii: osnovnye problemy racional’nogo ispol’zovanija i ohrany (Water resources of Karelia: main problems of rational use and protection), Trudy Karel’skogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 2011, Vol. 4, pp. 12–20.

Lukina N. V., Global’nye vyzovy i lesnye jekosistemy (Global challenges and forest ecosystems), Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 2020, Vol. 90, No 6, pp. 528–532.

Madlener R., Kowalski K., Stagl S., New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: the case of renewable energy use in Austria, Energy policy, 2007, Vol. 35, No 12, pp. 6060–6074.

Madlener R., Kowalski K., Stagl S., New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: the case of renewable energy use in Austria, Energy policy, 2007, Vol. 35, No 12, pp. 6060–6074.

Magnuszewski P., Sendzimir J., Kronenberg J., Conceptual modeling for adaptive environmental assessment and management in the Barycz Valley, Lower Silesia, Poland, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2005, Vol. 2, No 2, pp. 194–203.

Messier C., Fortin M. J., Schmiegelow F., Doyon F., Cumming S. G., Kimmins J. P., Seely B., Welham C., Nelson J., Modelling tools to assess the sustainability of forest management scenarios / Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: NRC Research Press, 2003, pp. 531–580.

Morán-Ordóñez A., Roces-Díaz J. V., Otsu K., Ameztegui A., Coll L., Lefevre F., Retana J., Brotons L., The use of scenarios and models to evaluate the future of nature values and ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests, Regional Environmental Change, 2019, Vol. 2, No 19, pp. 415–428.

MЕA: Millennium Ecosystem Assestment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2005, Vol. 5, 155 p.

Nakicenovic N., Swart R., Emissions scenarios-special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, UK, 2000, 612 р.

NPS: National Park Service. Using Scenarios to Explore Climate Change: A Handbook for Practitioners, National Park Service Climate Change Response Program, Colorado: Fort Collins, 2013.

OON 2020: Doklad o Celjah v oblasti ustojchivogo razvitija (UN 2020: Report on the Sustainable Development Goals), 2020, 68 p.

Order FR, 2021, No 3052-r, from 20 October, Available at: https://clck.ru/emHLk (2022, 28 February).

Order FR, 2021, No 312-r, from 11 February, Available at: https://clck.ru/pkehm (2022, 28 February).

Oteros-Rozas E., Martín-López B., Daw T., Bohensky E. L., Butler J., Hill R., …, & Vilardy S., Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies, Ecology and Society, 2015, Vol. 20, No 4, 32 p. 

Pillkahn U., Technology intelligence: basis for a smart business strategies, Futures Research Quarterly, 2005, Vol. 21, pp. 5–17.

Pillkahn U., Using trends and scenarios as tools for strategy development: shaping the future of your enterprise, John Wiley & Sons, 2008, 224 p.

Podderzhka prinjatija reshenij po jekosistemnym uslugam lesov Evropy — opredelenie cennosti, sinergeticheskie jeffekty i kompromissy: otchet o NIR (promezhutoch.) (Decision Support for Ecosystem Services of Europe’s Forests — Valuation, Synergies and Trade-offs: Research Report (Interim) ruk. Lukina N. V. Moscow: CEPF RAS, 2019, 193 p.

Porter M. E., Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, New York, USA: Free Press, 1998. 558 р.

Prognoz razvitija lesnogo sektora Rossijskoj Federacii do 2030 goda (Forecast of the development of the forest sector of the Russian Federation until 2030), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012, 96 p.

Prognozy social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii, 2021, Available at: https://clck.ru/Xvr4j (2021, 25 October).

Reed M. S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell С., Quinn С. Н., Stringer L. C., Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management, Journal of environmental management, 2009, Vol. 90, No 5, pp. 1933–1949.

Reed M. S., Kenter J., Bonn A., Broad K., Burt T. P., Fazey I. R., Fraser E. D. G., Hubacek K., Nainggolan D., Quinn C. H., Stringer L. C., Ravera F., Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands, Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, Vol. 128, pp. 345–362. 

Renn O., Participatory processes for designing environmental policies, Land use policy, 2006, Vol. 23, No 1, pp. 34–43.

Riahi K., Van Vuuren D. P., Kriegler E., Edmonds J., O’Neill B. C., Fujimori S., Bauer N., …, & Tavoni M.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview, Global environmental change, 2017, Vol. 42, pp. 153–168.

Ritchey T., Futures Studies using Morphological Analysis, Adapted from an Article for the Millennium Project: Futures Research Methodology Series, Version 3.0, 2009, 14 p.

Rounsevell M. D. A., Metzger M. J., Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment, Advanced Review, 2010, Vol. 1, No 4, pp. 606–619.

Rowland E. L., Cross M. S., Hartmann H., Considering Multiple Futures: Scenario Planning to Address Uncertainty in Natural Resource Conservation, Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014, 172 р.

Rozenberg A. G., Ocenka i prognoznye scenarii izmenenij ekosistemnyh uslug dlya dostizheniya ustojchivogo razvitiya Samarskoj oblasti. Diss. … kand. biol. nauk, Tol’yatti: Institut ekologii Volzhskogo bassejna RAN, 163 p.

Schmolke A., Thorbek P., DeAngelis D. L. Grimm V., Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future, Trends in ecology & evolution, 2010, Vol. 25, No 8, pp. 479–486.

Schoemaker P. J., Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking, Sloan management review, 1995, Vol. 36, No 2, p. 25.

Schüll A. E., Schröter W., Guideline for the performance of participatory scenario processes in INTEGRAL, Unpublished report, 2013.

Schwartz P., The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World, New York: Currency Doubleday, 1996, 290 р.

Scientific approach to second MAG meeting in Russia, SINCERE, News, 07.05.2019 Available at: https://sincereforests.eu/scientific-approach-to-second-mag-meeting-in-russia/ (2022, 09 February).

Seidl R., Eastaugh C. S., Kramer K., Maroschek M., Reyer C., Socha J., Vacchiano G., Zlatanov T., Hasenauer H., Scaling issues in forest ecosystem management and how to address them with models, European Journal of Forest Research, 2015, Vol. 132, No 5–6, pp. 653–666.

Seidl R., Fernandes P. M., Fonseca T. F., Gillet F., Jönsson A. M., Merganičová K., Netherer S., Arpaci A., Bontemps J. D., Bugmann H., González-Olabarria J. R., Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review, Ecological Modelling, 2011, Vol. 222, No 4, pp. 903–924.

Seppelt R., Dormann C. F., Eppink F. V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A., Quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead, Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, Vol. 48, No 3, pp. 630–636. 

Shanin V. N., Komarov A. S., Bykhovets S. S., Simulation modelling for sustainable forest management: a case-study, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, Vol. 13, pp. 535–549.

Sheate W. R., Do Partidário M. R., Byron H., Bina O., Dagg S., Sustainability assessment of future scenarios: methodology and application to mountain areas of Europe, Environmental management, 2008, Vol. 41, No 2, pp. 282–299.

Sheppard S. R. J., Meitner M., Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups, Forest ecology and management, 2005, Vol. 207, No 1–2, pp. 171–187.

Soliva R., Rønningen K., Bella I., Bezak P., Cooper T., Flø B. E., …, & Potter C., Envisioning upland futures: Stakeholder responses to scenarios for Europe’s mountain landscapes, Journal of Rural Studies, 2008, Vol. 24, No 1, pp. 56–71.

State of Europe’s Forests 2011. Status and Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe, UNECE, FAO, 2011, 173 p.

Steinmüller K., Szenarien — Ein Methodenkomplex zwischen wissenschaftlichem Anspruch und zeitgeistiger Bricolage [in:] Reinhold Popp (Hg.): Zukunft und Wissenschaft, Wege und Irrwege der Zukunftsforschung, 2012, pp. 101–137.

Sun X., Crittenden J. C., Li F., Lu Z., Dou X., Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA, Science of the Total Environment, 2018, No 622, pp. 974–987.

Svidetel’stvo № 2020666245. RUFOSS — programmnyj modul’ integracii imitacionnyh modelej dlja ocenki vzaimodejstvij mezhdu lesnymi jekosistemnymi uslugami: programma dlja JeVM (RUFOSS — Software module for integrating simulation models for assessing interactions between forest ecosystem services: a computer program) / S. I. Chumachenko, V. N. Shanin, E. M. Mitrofanov, S. V. Lebedev, P. V. Frolov, S. A. Kondrat’ev, M. V. Shmakova, N. V. Lukina, D. N. Teben’kova, L. G. Hanina, P. Ja. Grabarnik, O. G. Chertov, M. V. Bobrovskij (RU), Pravoobladatel’ CEPF RAS № 2020662086; zajavl. 12.10.2020. Opubl. 08.12.2020. 24 Kb.

Teben’kova D. N., Lukina N. V., Kataev A. D., Gagarin Ju. N., Kuznecova A. I., Orlova M. A., Scenarnyj podhod k modelirovaniju razvitija lesnyh uchastkov, Nauchnye osnovy ustojchivogo upravlenija lesami: Materialy III Vseross. (s mezhdunar. uchastiem) nauchnoj konferencii (g. Moskva, 30 oktjabrja — 1 nojabrja 2018 g.), (Scientific foundations of sustainable forest management: III All-Russian scientific conference with international participation), Moscow: CEPF RAS, 2018, pp. 173–174.

Thompson A. A., Strickland A. J., Crafting and implementing strategy: text and readings, Chicago: Irwin, 1995.

Tompkins E. L., Few R., Brown K., Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change, Journal of environmental management, 2008, Vol. 88, No 4, pp. 1580–1592.

Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, United Nations, 2015, 41 p.

Traynham B., An Application of Event Tree Analysis to Ecological Systems: Understanding the Long Term Performance of Engineered Covers, WM2010 Conference, March 7–11, Phoenix, AZ Session 32 Environmental Remediation Progress Toward Closure of Contaminated Sites, pp. 1–14, Available at: https://clck.ru/dP7gc (2022, 28 February).

Turner M. G., Gardner R. H., Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice, New York: Pattern and Process Springer, 2015, 499 p.

Van den Belt M., Mediated modeling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building, Washington, DC: Island Press, 2004, 363 p.

Van der Heijden K., Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation, John Wiley & Sons, 1996, 384 р.

Van Notten P. W. F., Rotmans J., Van Asselt M. B., Rothman D. S., An updated scenario typology, Futures, 2003, Vol. 35, No 5, pp. 423–443.

Van Oosten C., Restoring landscapes — Governing place: A learning approach to forest landscape restoration, Journal of sustainable forestry, 2017, Vol. 32, No 7, pp. 659–676.

Van Vuuren D. P., Kok M., Lucas P. L., Prins A. G., Alkemade R., Van der Berg M., Bouwman L., Van der Esch S., Jeuken M., Kram T., Stehfest E., Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, Vol. 98, pp. 303–323.

Virapongse A., Brooks S., Metcalf E. C., Zedalis M., Gosz J., Kliskey A., Alessa L., A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management, Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, Vol. 178, pp. 83–91.

Volkery A., Ribeiro T., Scenario planning in public policy: understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2009, Vol. 76, pp. 1198–1207. 

Von Reibnitz U., Szenarien-Optionen für die Zukunft, McGraw-Hill, 1987.

Vorob’ev D. V., Tipy lesov Evropejskoj chasti SSSR (Forest types discovered parts of the USSR), Kiev: Izd-vo AN USSR, 1953, 452 p.

Vtoroj ocenochnyj doklad Rosgidrometa ob izmenenijah klimata i ih posledstvijah na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii (The second assessment report of Roshydromet on climate change and its consequences on the territory of the Russian Federation), Moscow: Rosgidromet, 2014, 1009 p.

Wikström P., Edenius L., Elfving B., Eriksson L. O., Lämås T., Sonesson J., Öhman K., Wallerman J., Waller C., Klintebäck F., The Heureka forestry decision support system: an overview, International journal of mathematical and computational forestry & natural-resource sciences, 2011, Vol. 3, No 2, pp. 87–95.

Wilms F. E. P. Szenariotechnik: Vom Umgang mit der Zukunft, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt, 2006.

Wollenberg E., Edmunds D., Buck L., Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of community forests, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, Vol. 47, No 1, pp. 65–77. 

Zamolodchikov D. G., Grabovskij V. I., Prognoznye ocenki lesnyh stokov na period do 2050 goda i vklad lesnogo sektora v objazatel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii po novomu klimaticheskomu soglasheniju (Forecast estimates of forest flows for the period up to 2050 and the contribution of the forest sector to the obligations of the Russian Federation under the new climate agreement), Ispol’zovanie i ohrana prirodnyh resursov v Rossii, 2014, No 3, pp. 23–27.

Zarandian A., Baral H., Stork N. E., Ling M. A., Yavari A. R., Jafari H. R., Amirnejad H., Modeling of ecosystem services informs spatial planning in lands adjacent to the Sarvelat and Javaherdasht protected area in northern Iran, Land Use Policy, 2017, No 61, pp. 487–500.